Home > News of Note > Strange Majority

Strange Majority

February 20, 2007 Leave a comment Go to comments

The word used most often to describe the current makeup of the Supreme Court is “divided”, and in many ways that is true. Any 5-4 split decisions always goes along these lines: Roberts, Alito, Thomas, and Scalia (conservatives) voting as a block and Stevens, Ginsburg, Breyer, Souter (liberals) voting as a block, with Kennedy playing the role of kingmaker.

So it is strange anytime a 5-4 split falls along different lines, such as todays’ decision in the Philip Morris case. Now, it is entirely possible Scalia and Stevens¬†dissented for vastly different reasons. Nonetheless, I had to read the paragraph twice to make sure I did not misread.

You know, for a body that’s supposed to be above the fray of politics, SCOTUS has certainly become a symbol of America’s political schism.

Categories: News of Note
  1. No comments yet.
  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: